Performers on various instruments associated
with the orchestra must have been found in New York City
in 1766, for in October of this year, William Tuckey,
organist of Trinity, advertised for " gentlemen who play
on any instrument to lend assistance " in a sacred
concert. This particular concert was not held in a
church, however, but was given at Burns' New Assembly
Rooms. The instrumental music, and incidentally the
orchestra work which William Tuckey zealously introduced
and promoted in New York City, became the pioneer
movement which later resulted in this city becoming a
leader in orchestral presentation. To William Tuckey
should be given the credit for awakening an early
interest in instrumental music in general, and in
orchestral work in particular.
The St. Cecilia Society, established in New York in
1791, was organized for the purpose of promoting
instrumental music. This society had been preceded by
earlier organizations, the Apollo and the Musical
Society of the City of New York, both of which were
pioneers in orchestral music. In 1799 there was
organized the Euterpean Society, which combined social
features with its amateur orchestra, its rehearsals
becoming general assembly nights for musicians, literary
men, and artists. Its public concerts were held in the
City Hall and were followed by a ball and supper.
The first Philharmonic Society of New York was organized
by the merging of the St. Cecilia and the Harmonical
Societies on Dec. 9, 1799, and the first Philharmonic
concert was held Dec. 23, 1800. This organization, while
not keeping regularly together, during the earlier
decades of the Nineteenth Century nevertheless exercised
an influence upon the musical life of New York. The
second Philharmonic of New York, which was destined to
influence the orchestral work of other musical centers
in the United States, was established in 1842. Its
orchestra, at the inception of the still existing
Philharmonic Society, numbered between fifty and sixty
performers. In the meanwhile the old Philharmonic had
been superseded by the Musical Fund Society, which
latter also had its place in the development of
orchestral music
http://www.tribalsmile.com/music/article_13.shtml
New York, July 27, 1828.
The reason why I have not written before, although I
have been here since the third of June, is this; I
wished to be able to write somewhat more particularly
about myself, and especially to be able to give more
information respecting the position of music here.
I have been engaged at the Lafayette
theatre and received ----. I am going soon to Boston,
which is reported to be a very musical place. The
following will give an idea of music in this city; New
York has four theatres, the Park, Bowry, [sic.]
Lafayette and Schottam {Chatham]. In these
theatres are performed tragedies, comedies, melodramas;
also passages from operas, as for instance he Wolf-den
scene (in Der Freyschütz), – not with the music,
however, but melodramatically, – and operettas. A
complete and fully appointed opera is not to be thought
of; they have no orchestras for that, for the orchestras
here are in the highest degree bad, as bad as it is
possible to imagine, and not then complete; oft-times
they have two clarinets – but that is a great deal –
generally but one. One sees nothing of bassoons,
oboes, trumpets, or drums (?); perhaps, now and then,
one of the former. Oboes are entirely unknown in this
country; there exists but one oboist in North America,
and he is said to live in Baltimore.
But in spite of all their incompleteness they play the
symphonies of Haydn and grand overtures; and when
there comes a gap, they think to themselves – only
a passing matter – all right as soon as all cracks
again.
In every one of the orchestras you are sure to find a
trombone; this instrument serves only to strengthen, and
therefore never plays its own proper part, but
that of the violoncello; and if the subject is suitable,
it plays now and then a passage with the violin. This
instrument and the double bass are also the best paid;
sixteen or seventeen dollars a week is not uncommon; the
others have ten; some better twelve, and the very
highest for a first clarinet is fifteen, because the
usefulness of this instrument comes next to that of a
contrebass and the trumpet; but the player must be able
to blow strong.
It is a matter of course that the director of the
orchestra accompanies every solo with the violin;
therefore one never hears a solo performed alone; one
reason of this is probably to strengthen the voice.
In all these theatres they perform six times
a week; Sunday is a day of rest. The
performances begin at 7½ and last till 12, often till
one in the morning. If a rope dancer comes, or one
who can play the clown well, or jump about a little
something like dancing, and in addition can make up all
sorts of faces, and farther, one who can grind a
hand-organ, blow the panpipes, beat a pair of cymbals
and a big drum, and jingle a string of bells upon his
hat, and all of these at once, – these are the men
that are good for the treasury of the theatrical
lessees, and who make enormous sums.
Such is the condition of music here, so far as I have
been able to learn it during my short stay in New
York. I am now going to see if it is better in
Boston; I have my doubts of it.
I a pecuniary point of view, music is a lucrative
business for men who in addition to their regular
engagements can give lessons on the piano or guitar.
Such persons can save up a small fortune in a short
time; – but only on these two instruments; nobody
finds time for any other. Good teachers get one thaler
(75 cents) a lesson; others get eighteen thalers
($13,50) for twenty-four lessons.
Living is not very dear here; young musicians from
Germany, even those with only moderate talents, who
could scarcely keep soul and body together at home by
their music, find good incomes here, and if economical,
make their fortunes; and moreover, they find
themselves placed in the first rank of artists. However,
for lesson giving, the English tongue is an
indispensable necessity.
Next time farther from Boston.
[Dwight’s Journal, vol. 3 no. 5 (7 May 1853) p. 38.
“Music in New York twenty-five years since. (By a German
Musician)” with the following additional annotations:
[“To see oursel’s as others see us” is no bad plan, and
as Gungl has held up the mirror in these latter days to
the musical public, here is a sort of retrospective
looking glass to go with his, in which we may see
ourselves (with a German’s eyes) as we looked quarter of
a century since. The letter is to be found in
Gottfried Weber’s musical periodical, “The
Caecelia, ” vol. IX, “printed word for word after
the original,” and we translate it literally.] and [The
letter from Boston is not forthcoming; whether the music
was too good to speak of in this city at that epoch or
not, we have no intimation.]]
The Daniel Schlesinger memorial concert or “Grand
Musical Solemnity” on June 25, 1839 featured a large
orchestra including 5 horns. See the Evening Star, June
29, 1829
February 1842 Concerts in this year of the
Philharmonic’s birth were not unduly plentiful. Those
given by the essentially private music societies – the
Eurterpean and Condordia – were not advertised,
consequently infrequently reviewed. Watson, who attented
a Concordia concert at the City Hotel, offers a rare
glimpse of what they offered. … Their
ambitious program included among instrumental works,
the Freischütz Overture and “Hunting Symphony
(Jägersinfonie (1837), op. 9) by the Bohemian composer
Jan Bedrich Kittl (1809-1868). (New World, February 26,
1842, p. 145).
|